CNN-Based Image Validation for ESG Reporting: An Explainable AI and Blockchain Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63530/IJCSITR_2024_05_04_007Keywords:
Green FinTech, Visual Auditing, Deep Learning, Compliance Monitoring, ESG, Convolutional Neural Networks, Satellite Imagery, Explainable AI, Image Classification, Smart ContractsAbstract
With sustainability increasingly becoming a major focal point in FinTech innovations, Green FinTech platforms have been forced to justify the authenticity of their environmental claims. Yet, the existing auditing processes, which are overwhelmingly dominated by manual inspections and document-based verifications, have proved insufficient in guaranteeing transparency, speed, or scale. The matter is more acute when the data to be validated constitutes visual or geospatial evidence: images of solar installations, satellite visuals of deforestation, or drone footage of carbon offset projects. To bridge that gap, this present study attempts to establish an AI-driven visual auditing framework that exploits the deep learning technique-aided by convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-to perform automatic image-based compliance monitoring for ESG-aligned FinTech platforms.
The framework can ingest multi-source visual inputs, including satellite imagery and drone views, alongside on-site IoT camera feeds and investor-submitted images, to assess the environmental compliance of a project remotely and almost instantaneously. Domain-specific datasets train deep learning models to capture environmental indicators, which include the placement of renewable infrastructure, illegal land clearing, water contamination, and fraudulent waste disposal. Performance analysis illustrates that the classification accuracy of over 92% and precision rate surpassing 90% can be achieved by the CNN-based system when it is used for the identification of non-compliant activities. In order to make the decision boundaries of the model interpretable-a key requirement for enhancing transparency to regulators and stakeholders-XAI methods, including SHAP and Grad-CAM, are integrated into the system.
For audit-result integrity and traceability, outputs of audits are recorded in a permissioned blockchain using smart contracts that automatically deliver alerts and reports. Regulatory integration is supported through the standardization of the output format of the system in line with major reference frameworks, such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).
This paper introduces a novel, scalable, and policy-aware framework that fills the gap between AI-enabled automation and regulatory compliance in sustainability auditing. It also tackles the ethical dimension from all vantage points by embedding transparency and explainability in every layer of the system architecture. The findings suggest that AI-powered visual auditing has the potential to disrupt the traditional methods whereby FinTech firms validate and report on environmental performance, thus combating greenwashing and sustaining trust within sustainable finance ecosystems.
References
Javed, A. R., Ahmed, W., Pandya, S., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Gadekallu, T. R., & Khan, M. A. (2023). A survey of explainable artificial intelligence for smart cities. Electronics, 12(3), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030567
Hamzat, L. (2023). Real-time financial resilience and debt optimization for entrepreneurs: Tackling debt management as a financial health pandemic and empowering small businesses. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375198074
Sindiramutty, S. R. (2023). Autonomous threat hunting: A future paradigm for AI-driven threat intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00286. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00286
Agarwal, J. D., Agarwal, M., Agarwal, A., & Shah, R. (2021). Economics of cryptocurrencies: Artificial intelligence, blockchain, and digital currency. In Information for efficient decision-making (pp. 151–176). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811222146_0010
Chandana, M., Bandaranayake, S., Jain, A., & Gupta, A. (2024). Responsible AI in Asia. LIRNEasia. https://lirneasia.net/ai-responsibility
Shilongo, K., Gaffley, M., Plantinga, P., & Adams, R. (2024). Landscape study of AI policies and use in Southern Africa. International Development Research Centre (IDRC). https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org
Paliszkiewicz, J., & Gołuchowski, J. (2024). Trust and artificial intelligence. In Development and Challenges in the Digital Economy (pp. 89–102). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003334567-7
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
Alammar, J. (2020). A Visual Introduction to Deep Learning. Distill.pub. https://distill.pub/2020/circuits/early-vision/
Binns, R., Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). 'It's reducing a human being to a percentage': Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173951
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
Chen, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, J., & Xu, X. (2022). Digital finance and green innovation: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121511
R. Ramadugu.“Fintech, Remittances, and Financial Inclusion: A Case Study of Cross-Border Payments in Developing Economies,” Jun. 15, 2023. https://universe-publisher.com/index.php/jcit/article/view/52
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608
European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206
Gai, K., Qiu, M., & Sun, X. (2018). A survey on FinTech. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 103, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.10.011
Ge, L., Liu, C., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Application of Blockchain in ESG information transparency. Sustainability, 14(4), 2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042133
Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
Kute, D. V., Pradhan, B., Shukla, N., & Alamri, A. (2021). Deep learning and explainable AI techniques applied for detecting money laundering: A critical review. IEEE Access, 9, 147232–147251. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3124356
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
Nguyen, G., Dlugolinsky, S., Tran, V., & Hluchý, L. (2019). Machine learning and deep learning frameworks and libraries for large-scale data mining. AI Review, 52, 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-09679-z
Autade R. Navigating Challenges in Real-Time Payment Systems in FinTech. IJAIDSML [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 31 [cited 2025 Jun. 11];5(1):44-56. Available from: https://ijaidsml.org/index.php/ijaidsml/article/view/108
Nguyen, T., & Yu, X. (2021). ESG disclosure and greenwashing: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(4), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1826537
OECD. (2021). Principles on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instruments. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD, 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Sadowski, J. (2020). The limits of transparency: Explainable AI and the governance of algorithmic decision-making. New Media & Society, 22(7), 1369–1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819873566
SHAP Developers. (2022). SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). GitHub. https://github.com/slundberg/shap
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.
United Nations. (2020). Financing for Sustainable Development Report 2020. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/financing-for-sustainable-development-report-2020.html
Van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(86), 2579–2605.
Weller, A. (2019). Transparency: Motivations and challenges. In Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning (pp. 23–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6_2
WindNet Dataset. (2023). Annotated Wind Turbine Drone Dataset for AI Research. https://windnet.ai/dataset
Ramakrishna Ramadugu. Unraveling the Paradox: Green Premium vs. Climate Risk Premium in Sustainable Investing. ABS International Journal of Management, Asian business school; ABSIC 2024 -12th International Conference, Noida, India. pp.71-89. ⟨hal-04931523⟩
Zhang, K., Song, D., Chen, Y., & Ni, J. (2021). A survey on blockchain-enabled smart contracts. IEEE Access, 9, 87672–87694. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088352
Zhou, Y., Jin, D., He, Y., & Xu, Z. (2022). Blockchain-driven trustworthy decision-making for sustainable finance. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103412
Autade R. Multi-Modal GANs for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Machine and Financial Activity Streams. IJAIDSML [Internet]. 2022 Mar. 30 [cited 2025 Jun. 11];3(1):39-48.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arpit Garg (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




